Month: October 2014


all saints, honiara

all saints, honiara

I am three today. Three years on in a new identity – bishop.

A friend gave me a lovely bottle of wine. I’ll save it for a couple more years; it needs to mellow some. Me too.

I looked back through some photos and I have been part of some wonderful moments as a result of being ‘in the pink.’ Confirmations stand out. Many moments for which I gave thanks to God, and thanks to colleagues/ the people of God.

The photo attached is of a statue outside the bishop’s chapel in Honiara. I was there recently. The photo seems apposite because … well, I am constantly told that I am not good at smiling, and the crozier is busted (I have lost a segment of mine and so don’t have one anymore), and …

A feature of the 1979 Book of Common Prayer (Episcopal) is that it has a rubric (instruction) that the ordinand in an episcopal ordination is “vested in a rochet or alb, without stole, tippet, or 
other vesture distinctive of ecclesiastical or academic rank or order.” I take this rubric to contain an important truth: that one sets aside one’s priesthood to become a bishop. It is a truth that I failed to notice carefully enough when I was ordained bishop three years ago. I have found the letting go of an identity that I once had a deeply challenging part of taking up a new one.

I think the most pressing challenge is the daily and long-term challenge of leadership. In recent weeks I have found Ronald Heifetz’s discussion of the distinction bettwen authority and leadership a very helpful one; likewise his distinction between ‘adaptive’ and ‘technical’ leadership. (For those who don’t know his work the following lecture gives a nice little introduction. )

The church faces huge challenges and our capacity to face these challenges depends on the leadership that we offer each other. I pray for the strength and courage that i\we all need.


welcome into the house, our home

napier cathedralThe day before we ordained Andrew Hedge as the new Bishop of Waiapu, the House of Bishops had a day long meeting. I mean to share an insider’s perspective on an aspect of the meeting.

It might be thought that this is a breaking of a code of silence that is meant veil all such meetings – the equivalent of the sharing with all in sundry the know how on the secret handshake. However, I don’t think I disclose any confidences that properly exist and ought to abide. What I want to share is something that I think actually discloses a feature of our whole church culture. For those who understand something about family systems, the House of Bishops belongs to the family system of the church. So, what I am sharing and wondering about is about all of the church not just the house of bishops.

Enough preliminaries, onto our actual meeting.

It went like this: It was a languid start as the bishops arrived in dribs and drabs -the way most anglican gatherings go. We prayed. Then the Archbishop chairing introduced the various items of business. Many of them unfolded in the same format and manner. The Archbishop would offer some opening comments about (say) the ‘Rural Ministry and Mission Development Commission.’ (This a fictitious body dreamt up for the sake of this blog. It sounds like the worthy title for a something that is important and perhaps there should be such a Commission but to the best of my knowledge there is no such body.) The Archbishop tells us how important the Commission is in the life of the church. Then, and this is the kicker, he tells us that they want/ need a bishop to serve on this body. We go silent and look at the tables. If you were to look up you would see the bishops with their thumbs (metaphorically) pressed to their foreheads in the ancient and early christian gesture that signals “not me.” Then someone else speaks and says that they agree that ‘Rural Mission and Ministry’ is very important but, because of a conflict of interest they have in the ‘Ancient Order of Tractor Drivers,’ they cannot be on the Commission but someone certainly should be. More of the aforementioned table watching and thumb pressing and silence follows. It is painful and slow. Torture even. We have several such items and then we break for lunch or morning tea and then we do some more of the same ritual.

The problem is that we all feel too busy already. The issue is busy-ness. All the bishops I know well enough to really say have too many things to do and too many places to be at. So, it is not that any of us do not think that (in this imaginary case) ‘Rural mission and ministry’ isn’t important or even vital. It is just there isn’t the space in our lives for anything more – at least not without letting others down terribly.

Of course, it is the case that the bishops need to order their lives differently and prioritize what it is we can and really should do. But it is also the case that the whole church do some reflecting and prioritizing too. I don’t just mean in relation to the bishops and what is expected of them; that would be just one edge of the issue and it is much bigger than the house of bishops.

At very least my prayer is that the Diocese of Waiapu ask themselves seriously as to what it wants their new bishop to do and be in their midst – Bishop Andrew was given two jobs in his absence on Friday!